It seems that some aims needs to be stated here to know what are purposes are:
- Defend video gaming as an entertainment medium
- Cut through media spin
- Identify and explain profiteering examples and methods
- Offer genuine reviews with a clear system that goes beyond a simple numerical scale to help informed consumer choice
- Consumer capitalism is a free market and should remain so with no government intervention aside from the classification of games
- Although individual games may be considered art the video game industry is a commercial enterprise and should be accountable for it's business practices
- Paying customers should get value for money
- Video games do not create or cause violence
- Every game/developer/producer/platform should thrive or fall purely on it's merits
- Skeptism should be applied to everything
- This project will never be for financial gain in any form, this includes freebies
- Discussion is encouraged, disagreement doesn't equate to a personal dislike
"We have the power to stop and reverse the tides of time by making our awareness of abuse known to the powers of industry and their uncouth political arms. Only by raising the awareness and promoting personal peace within today’s self-defeatist society, can we allow the planet a chance to avoid self-destruction!
OPEN YOUR EYES, OPEN YOUR MOUTHS,
CLOSE YOUR HANDS AND MAKE A FIST"
Daron Malakian
Excellent article! I don't think customers get the value for money as they used to, with games nowadays consisting of practically all sequels. Some originality please...
ReplyDeleteOne thing I would say is that there have been some scientific research that says video games do increase aggression and similar things.
Thanks for the feedback, it is really appreciated. I believe we have every chance of getting what we want if the gaming community sticks to their guns about what products and services we want.
DeletePersonally I've got a strong history on critical review of studies and hopefully when I have the time to put in the proper research we will be able to show that those studies are fundamentally flawed and show bias. If it turns out that they aren't I will make a very large point of saying exactly where they show they are right and how I think it would be best addressed. If you have seen any particular studies that are of interest please feel free to send them on, I would love to see them.